Skip to main content
Logo image

Section 4.3 Algebra of Transformations

Subsection 4.3.1 Explore

Definition 4.3.1. Translation.

An transformation \(T\) is a translation if and only if there exists a non-zero constant vector \(\vec{v}\) such that \(T(P)-P=\vec{v}\) for all points \(P.\)

Definition 4.3.2. Rotation.

An transformation \(T\) is a rotation if and only if there exists a fixed point \(C\) and constant angle \(\alpha\) such that \(m\angle PCT(P) = \alpha \) and \(\|\overline{CP}\| = \|\overline{CT(P)}\|\) for all points \(P\)

Definition 4.3.3. Reflection.

An transformation \(T\) is a reflection if and only if there exists a fixed line \(\ell\) such that the line perpendicular to \(\ell\) through \(P\) contains \(T(P)\) and the distances from \(P\) and \(T(P)\) to the \(\ell\) are equal.
Let \(T\) be a rotation, and let \(C, P\text{,}\) and \(Q\) be points, so that \(P^\prime = T(P)\) and \(Q^\prime = T(Q)\text{.}\) By definition, \(\|\overline{CP}\| = \|\overline{CP^\prime}\|\) and \(\|\overline{CQ}\| = \|\overline{CQ^\prime}\|\) Note \(T\) is the same rotation for \(P\) and \(Q\text{,}\) so \(m\angle PCP^\prime = m\angle QCQ^\prime = \alpha\text{.}\) If we let \(\beta = m\angle PCQ\text{,}\) then \(m\angle P^\prime CQ^\prime = \beta + \alpha - \alpha = \beta\text{,}\) so \(\angle PCQ \cong \angle P^\prime CQ^\prime\text{.}\) Thus, we^\primeve found an SAS correspondence between the two triangles \(\triangle CPQ\) and \(\triangle CP^\prime Q^\prime\text{,}\) so \(\triangle CPQ \cong \triangle CP^\prime Q^\prime\text{.}\) By CPCTC, \(\|\overline{PQ}\| = \|\overline{P^\prime Q^\prime}\|\text{.}\) Therefore, T is an isometry.
Consider a transformation with points \(A, B,\) and \(C\text{.}\) We will show that \(||A - B|| = ||A^\prime - B^\prime||, ||A - C|| = ||A^\prime - C^\prime||,\) and \(||B - C|| = ||B^\prime - C^\prime||\) through direct proof.
\(||A - A^\prime|| = ||\vec{v}||, ||B - B^\prime|| = ||\vec{v}||,\) and \(||C - C^\prime|| = ||\vec{v}||\) by definition of a transformation. Construct quadrilateral \(A^\prime C^\prime CA\) by drawing sides \(\overline AA^\prime, \overline A^\prime C^\prime, \overline CC^\prime,\) and \(\overline AC.\) Note that \(A^\prime C^\prime CA\) has two sides \(\overline AA^\prime\) and \(\overline CC^\prime\) that are \(\vec{v},\) so these two sides are parallel and have the same length. This means that the other two sides \(\overline A^\prime C^\prime\) and \(\overline AC\) are equidistant where they meet both of \(\vec{v},\) the two sides have the same slope and are thus parallel (from ruler postulate and equidistance postulate). The quadrilateral is now known to be a parallelogram by definition of a parallelogram. \(\overline AC \cong \overline A^\prime C^\prime\) (also by definition of a parallelogram), so \(||A - C|| = |A^\prime - C^\prime||.\)
For transformations with only two original points, we are done. For larger transformations, we can similarly show that \(||A - B|| = ||A^\prime - B^\prime||\) and \(||B - C|| = ||B^\prime - C^\prime||\) (and so on if the transformation is larger than three points). From the last three equations, by definition of isometry, translations are isometries.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be points and let \(T\) be a reflection in the plane over the line \(\ell\text{.}\) Without loss of generality, let \(P\) be the point further from the line \(\ell\text{.}\) Let \(q = \|Q-\ell\|\) and \(p = \|P-\ell\|\text{.}\) Also, let \(A\) and \(B\) be the points where \(\|\overline{PT(P)}\|\) and \(\|\overline{QT(Q)}\|\) intersect \(\ell\) respectively. Since \(T\) is a reflection, \(q = \|T(Q)-\ell\|\) and \(p = \|T(P)-\ell\|\text{.}\) Then, let \(r = p - q\text{.}\) Place a point \(R\) on \(\|\overline{PT(P)}\|\) such that \(R\) is \(r\) away from \(P\text{.}\) Then, \(\triangle PQR\) is a right triangle. Furthermore, \(\overline{AB} \cong \overline{RQ}\text{.}\) All of these constructions can be performed similarly for the transformed points, and so we have that \(\triangle T(P)T(R)T(Q)\) is a right triangle, and \(\overline{AB} \cong \overline{T(R)T(Q)}\) . Also, \(\overline{PR} \cong \overline{T(P)T(R)}\) as points and their reflections are equidistant to \(\ell\) and they are all collinear. So, by SAS, \(\triangle PQR \cong \triangle T(P)T(R)T(Q)\) and therefore \(\|P-Q\| = \|T(P)-T(Q)\|\)

Checkpoint 4.3.5.

Draw an arbitrary triangle \(ABC.\) Draw the result \(\triangle A'B'C'\) of some translation. Draw the result \(\triangle A''B''C''\) of some translation applied to \(\triangle A'B'C'.\) Determine which type of isometry would transform \(\triangle ABC \) to \(\triangle A''B''C''.\)
Solution.
I created a \(\triangle ABC\) and then translated it to become \(\triangle DEF\text{.}\) I then translated \(\triangle DEF\) into \(\triangle GHI\text{.}\) I noticed that I could translate \(\triangle ABC\) into\(\triangle GHI\) through one translation.

Checkpoint 4.3.6.

Complete the following table of composition of isometries.
Translate Reflect Rotate
Translate
Reflect
Rotate

Checkpoint 4.3.7.

What is the result of composing a reflection and a rotation?
Solution.
Take an arbitrary polygon. Translate, then reflect. (Note vertex D = vertex F')
Reflect, then translate. We will use the same line of reflection and translate vector.
The composition of these two isometries is not commutative; both compositions produce the same new genre of isometry, which has been termed a “glide.” For this arbitrary polygon, you cannot produce the glide isometry via rotation because of the chirality or the handedness of the object.
However, a special case arises: when the translate vector is perpendicular to the line of reflection. Translate then reflect produces a reflection (once again, note that vertex E = vertex C'). Reflect then translate also produces a reflection. The line of reflection is itself translated.

Checkpoint 4.3.8.

The composition of two rotations is a rotation with a translation.
Solution.
Consider a general rotation composed with another general rotation. Using concepts from the previous section, we end up with the product of six matrices: \(\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0& a_2 \\ 0& 1& b_2 \\ 0& 0& 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \cos \theta & -\sin \theta & 0 \\ \sin \theta & \cos \theta & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0& -a_2 \\ 0& 1& -b_2 \\ 0& 0& 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0& a_1 \\ 0& 1& b_1 \\ 0& 0& 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \cos \phi & -\sin \phi & 0 \\ \sin \phi & \cos \phi & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0& -a_1 \\ 0& 1& -b_1 \\ 0& 0& 1 \end{bmatrix}\text{,}\) which equals \(\begin{bmatrix} \cos ( \theta + \phi ) & -\sin (\theta + \phi) & (-\cos (\phi) a_1 + \sin (\phi) b_1 + a_1 - a_2) \cos (\theta) + (\sin (\phi) a_1 + \cos (\phi) b_1 - b_1 + b_2) \sin (\theta) + a_2 \\ \sin (\theta + \phi) & \cos (\theta + \phi) & (-\sin (\phi) a_1 - \cos (\phi) b_1 + b_1 - b_2) \cos (\theta) + (-\cos (\phi) a_1 + \sin (\phi) b_1 + a_1 - a_2) \sin (\theta) + b_2 \\ 0& 0& 1 \end{bmatrix}\text{,}\) which appears to be equivalent to the composition of a rotation and a translation, based on the analogous forms produced.

Subsection 4.3.2 Prove

Checkpoint 4.3.9.

How many isometry types are there?

Checkpoint 4.3.10.

How many isometry types are needed to generate all isometry types?

Checkpoint 4.3.11.

How many isometries are needed to generate all isometries?