Lemma 3.3.11.
Consider three points \(A,B,C\) with \(\ell_1\) and \(\ell_2\) the perpendicular bisectors of \(\overline{AB}\) and \(\overline{BC}\) respectively. Let \(M_2=\ell_2 \cap \overline{BC}.\) Show \(\ell_1 \parallel \ell_2\) implies the existence of \(D=\ell_2 \cap \stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{AB}\) such that \(A,\) \(B,\) and \(D\) are collinear and \(\angle BDM_2\) is a right angle.
Consider three points \(A, B\text{,}\) and \(C\) such that \(\ell_1\) and \(\ell_2\) are the perpendicular bisectors of \(\overline{AB}\) and \(\overline{BC}\) respectively. Let \(M_2 = \ell_2 \cap \overline{BC}\) be the midpoint of \(\overline{BC}\text{.}\) Finally, let \(\ell_1\) and \(\ell_2\) be parallel. Note because \(\ell_1 \parallel \ell_2\) and since they respectively perpendicularly bisect \(\overline{AB}\) and \(\overline{BC}\text{,}\) then \(\overline{AB}\) has to eventually intersect \(\ell_2\) using Ruler and Distance Postulates. This is because considering the point \(M_1 = \ell_1 \cap \overline{AB}\text{,}\) Playfair suggests there is only one line passing through \(M_1\) parallel to \(\ell_2\text{,}\) so \(\overleftrightarrow{AB}\) and \(\ell_2\) will intersect. Call this intersection point \(D = \overleftrightarrow{AB} \cap \ell_2\text{.}\) Because we've only extended \(\overleftrightarrow{AB}\text{,}\) we know \(A, B\text{,}\) and \(D\) are collinear. As well, note the line \(\ell_2\) contains both \(M_2\) and \(D\text{.}\) Because \(\ell_1 \parallel \ell_2\) imply the right angle formed by \(\ell_1\) and \(\overline{AB}\) equals \(\angle BDM_2\) by Alternate Interior Angles, then \(\angle BDM_2\) is a right angle. So, we have shown given \(\ell_1 \parallel \ell_2\text{,}\) that there exists \(D = \overleftrightarrow{AB} \cap \ell_2\) such that \(A, B\text{,}\) and \(D\) are collinear and \(\angle BDM_2\) is a right angle. Note the lemma is proven, but such construction is impossible under Euclidean geometry.
Consider triangle \(\triangle ABC\text{.}\) Let the midpoints of the sides be \(D\text{,}\) \(E\text{,}\) and \(F\text{,}\) respectively. Then the perpendicular bisectors of the three sides pass through \(D\text{,}\) \(E\text{,}\) and \(F\text{,}\) respectively.
Next consider any two perpendicular bisectors, say the bisectors of sides \(\overline{AB}\) and \(\overline{AC}\text{.}\) These bisectors intersect each other somewhere by repeated application of Pasch's axiom. Call their intersection \(G\text{.}\) Since \(G\) lies on the perpendicular bisector of each segment, it is equidistant from \(A\) and \(B\text{,}\) as well as from \(A\) and \(C\text{.}\) That means that the lengths \(AG\text{,}\) \(BG\text{,}\) and \(CG\) are all equal. Thus \(G\) is also equidistant from both \(B\) and \(C\text{,}\) so \(G\) lies on the perpendicular bisector of \(\overline{BC}\text{.}\)
Therefore, the three perpendicular bisectors of the sides of \(\triangle ABC\) meet at a single point.
Construct \(\triangle ABC\text{.}\) Let the midpoints of the sides of this triangle be \(D\text{,}\) \(E\text{,}\) and \(F\text{.}\) Extend the medians \(\overline{AE}\text{,}\) \(\overline{BF}\) and \(\overline{CD}\text{.}\)
Consider any two of the medians of \(\triangle ABC\text{,}\) say \(\overline{BF}\) and \(\overline{CD}\text{.}\) By repeated application of the Crossbar theorem, these medians intersect. Let their intersection be \(G\text{.}\) Next construct the line through points \(D\) and \(F\text{.}\) This line divides two sides of \(\triangle ABC\) proportionally, because \(D\) and \(F\) are the midpoints of sides \(\overline{AB}\) and \(overline{AC}\) respectively. By a previous theorem, this line is parallel to side \(\overline{BC}\text{.}\)
Next examine the triangles \(\triangle GBC\) and \(\triangle GFD\text{.}\) (The line \(DF\) contains a side of the second triangle.) We claim these triangles are similar. The angles at \(G\) are congruent because they are vertical angles. Then \(\angle FDG \cong \angle BCG\) by alternate interior angles, and likewise for \(\angle DFG\) and \(\angle GBC\text{.}\)
Since line \(DF\) divides the sides of \(\triangle ABC\) in half, the segment \(\overline{DF}\) has half the length of segment \(\overline{BC}\text{,}\) by triangle similarity. Thus the sides of \(\triangle GFD\) have half the length of the sides of triangle \(GCB\text{.}\) It follows that \(|CD| = 3|DG|\text{,}\) so \(|DG| = (1/3)|CD|\text{.}\) Since \(|CD| = |DG| + |GC|\text{,}\) we must have \(|CD| = (1/3)|CD| + |GC|\text{,}\) which implies that \(|GC| = (2/3)|CD|\text{.}\) So \(G\) lies two-thirds of the length down the median \(CD\text{.}\) Identical reasoning applies to the other medians.
First, we will prove that the point P on the angle bisector implies equidistance. \(\overrightarrow{AP}\) bisects \(\angle BAC \text{.}\) Since the distance between a point and a line is from the point to the foot of the perpendicular, \(m\angle PBA \cong m\angle PCA = \frac{\pi}{2}. \) By AAS, \(\Delta BAP \cong \Delta CAP \) By CPCTC, \(BP \cong CP\) and thus the point P is equidistant from AB and AC.
Second, we will prove that equidistance implies that the point P is on the angle bisector. P is a point in the interior of the angle BAC such that \(|BP| = |CP|\text{.}\)
\(\angle PBA \cong \angle PCA = \frac{\pi}{2} \) By RSS, \(\Delta BAP \cong \Delta CAP \) By CPCTC, \(\angle BAP \cong \angle CAP \) so P is on the angle bisector of \(\angle BAC\text{.}\)
First note that any two angle bisectors of \(\triangle ABC\) must intersect somewhere within the triangle by Crossbar: Since an angle bisector intersects a vertex of the triangle and there exists some point on the bisector within the triangle, the bisector must intersect the opposite side of the triangle at a point \(X\text{.}\) Apply the same reasoning to the triangle \(\triangle ABX\) to see that the other bisector must intersect the first.
We now show that each pair of bisectors intersects at the same point. Consider \(\triangle ABC\) and let \(G\) be the intersection of the angle bisectors of \(\angle ABC\) and \(\angle ACB\text{.}\) By the preceding theorem, \(G\) is equidistant from lines \(AB\) and \(BC\) and also from lines \(BC\) and \(AC.\) Note then that \(G\) must be same distance from all three lines. Let \(D\text{,}\) \(E\text{,}\) and \(F\) be the points at the foot of the perpendicular from \(G\) to segments \(\overline{AB}\text{,}\) \(\overline{BC}\text{,}\) and \(\overline{AC}\) respectively. Then we have shown that \(|DG| = |EG| = |FG|\text{.}\)
But then \(G\) is equidistant from the two sides of \(\angle BAC\text{,}\) and so it lies on the angle bisector of that angle as well. Therefore, the three angle bisectors of a triangle intersect at a single point.
We begin with triangle ABC. The altitudes of the triangle are AD, BE, and CF. We will show that the altitudes are concurrent. We construct triangle GHI such that H-A-G, H-B-I, G-C-I, and GH is parallel to BC, HI is parallel to AC, and GI is parallel to AB.
BC = AH because AHBC is a parallelogram. BC = AG because ABCG is a parallelogram. So AH = AG. AD is perpendicular to HG. So AD is simultaneously the perpendicular bisector of HG and the altitude from A to BC.
AC = BH because AHBC is a parallelogram. AC = BI because ABIC is a parallelogram. So BH = BI. BE is perpendicular to HI. So BE is simultaneously the perpendicular bisector of HI and the altitude from B to AC.
AB = CI because ABIC is a parallelogram. AB = CG because ABCG is a parallelogram. So CI = CG. CF is perpendicular to GI. So CF is simultaneously the perpendicular bisector of GI and the altitude from C to AB.
Since the perpendicular bisectors are concurrent, as proven in
Theorem 3.3.12, the altitudes are also concurrent.