The following theorem produces an easier to use version of Euclid's postulate.
Let \(\boldsymbol T\) be the statement, “The sum of the angles on one side of a transversal of two lines is equal to the sum of two right angles”. Let \(\boldsymbol P\) be the statement, “The lines are parallel.”
In Theorem 3.1.4 we proved \(\boldsymbol T \implies \boldsymbol P\text{.}\) On the other hand, Euclid's postulate states (in relevant part) \(\neg \boldsymbol T \implies \neg \boldsymbol P\text{.}\) Therefore, together they give \(\boldsymbol T \iff \boldsymbol P\text{.}\)
The alternate interior angle converse theorem states “Given parallel lines and a transversal of those lines, the alternate interior angles formed by the transversal are congruent.”
Suppose we're given two parallel lines \(L\) and \(M\) and a transversal intersecting points \(A\) and \(B\text{.}\) Now, construct a perpendicular from \(A\) to a point \(C\text{.}\) Applying Playfair, using the point \(B\text{,}\) construct a line segment \(\overline{BD}\) that is parallel to \(\overline{AC}\text{.}\) Because \(L\) is parallel to \(M\text{,}\) \(\overline{BD}\) also creates a bisection, so \(\angle ACB \cong \angle ADB\text{.}\) Note we have two triangles \(\triangle ABD\) and \(\triangle ABC\text{.}\) Because \(L\) is parallel to \(M\text{,}\) \(\angle DAB \cong \angle ABC\text{.}\) Of course, \(\overline{AB} \cong \overline{AB}\text{,}\) so the two triangles \(\triangle ADB\) and \(\triangle ABC\) are congruent. Therefore, by CPCTC, \(\overline{BD} \cong \overline{AC}\text{,}\) so the distance from \(L\) to \(M\) is always the same.
By contraposition, Euclid's postulate is equivalent to: “If lines \(l\) and \(m\) are parallel, then the angles on one side of a transversal of \(l\) and \(m\) sum to two right angles.” We therefore show that the equidistance of parallel lines implies that the angles on one side of a transversal of parallels sum to two right angles.
Let \(l\) and \(m\) be parallel lines. By the Equidistance Postulate, if \(X\) is any point on \(l\text{,}\) then \(\mathrm{d(X,m)} = k\) is a constant corresponding to the length of a line segment drawn from \(X\) to the foot of the perpendicular on \(m\text{.}\) Let \(t\) be a transversal of \(l\) and \(m\text{.}\) These line segments form right angles with both \(l\) and \(m\text{.}\)
Let \(t\) intersect \(l\) and \(m\) at \(A\) and \(C\) respectively. Let \(D\) and \(B\) be the points on \(l\) and \(m\) such that \(\overline{AB}\) and \(\overline{CD}\) have length \(k\text{.}\) Then the triangles \(\triangle ABC\) and \(\triangle CDA\) are congruent right triangles by Angle-Angle-Side.
Since \(\angle ACB\) and \(\angle DAC\) are congruent, their supplementary angles are also congruent. Thus \(\angle XAC \cong \angle YCA\text{.}\) But in that case \(\angle XAC\) is supplementary to \(\angle ACB\text{,}\) and so
\begin{equation*}
m\angle ACB + m\angle XAC = \pi
\end{equation*}
as claimed.
Therefore, if lines \(l\) and \(m\) are parallel, then angles on one side of a transversal of \(l\) and \(m\) sum to two right angles.