Skip to main content
Logo image

Section 3.1 Equivalent Parallel Postulates

Each of the following is an equivalent Euclidean postulate.
List 3.1.1. Equivalent Euclidean Postulates
  • (Playfair) Given a line and a point not on that line, there exists exactly one line through that point parallel to the given line.
  • (Equidistance) Lines that are parallel are everywhere equidistant.
  • (Euclid) Given two lines and a transversal of those lines, if the sum of the angles on one side of the transversal is less than two right angles then the lines meet on that side.

Subsection 3.1.1 Preparation

These theorems do not require a parallel postulate.
We prove the contrapositive. Suppose that lines \(AB\) and \(CD\) intersect at a point \(X\) and that points \(E\) and \(F\) lie on lines \(AB\) and \(CD\) respectively so that \(A-E-B\) and \(C-F-D\text{.}\) Then line \(EF\) is a transversal of lines \(AB\) and \(CD\) such that \(\angle EFC\) is an exterior angle of \(\triangle EFX\text{.}\) Then, by the Exterior Angle Theorem, \(m\angle EFC > m\angle FEX\text{.}\) But these two angles are alternate interior angles of the transversal formed by line \(EF\text{,}\) hence if two lines intersect, then the alternate interior angles formed by their transversal are not equal.
Consider a point \(A\) and a line containing \(B\text{,}\) where \(B\) is at the foot of the perpendicular. We want to show \(|AB|\) is the shortest distance, so we need to prove that for any point \(C\) along the line, that \(|AB| \lt |AC|\text{.}\) Construct a triangle with these points using the Distance and Angle postulates so they have the same known distance, where \(\overline{AB}\) bisects \(\overleftrightarrow{CB}\text{.}\) To show \(|AB| \lt |AC|\text{,}\) let's show that \(|AB| \neq |AC|\) and that \(|AB|\) is not greater than \(|AC|\text{.}\)
Case 1: Suppose to the contrary that \(|AB| = |AC|\text{.}\) This would imply (by Theorem 2.1.8) that \(\angle ACB \cong \angle ABC\text{.}\) However, we know \(\angle ABC = 90^\circ\) (by our bisection), so \(\angle ACB = 90^\circ\text{,}\) too. Extend \(\overline{BC}\) (opposite the side of the bisection) to include another point, \(D\text{.}\) By SMSG15, we know \(\angle ACD = 90^\circ\text{,}\) but Theorem 2.1.11 states the exterior angle must be greater than the opposing ones, so \(\angle ACD > \angle ABD\text{,}\) but \(90^\circ\) is not greater than \(90^\circ\text{,}\) so our original assumption was false. So \(|AB| \neq |AC|\text{.}\)
Case 2: Suppose to the contrary that \(|AB| > |AC|\text{.}\) Similarly, we know \(\angle ABC = 90^\circ\) by our bisection. By Theorem 2.1.19, the larger side (compared to \(|AC|\)) \(|AB|\) is opposite the larger angle; that is, \(\angle ACB > \angle ABC\text{.}\) Extend \(\overline{AC}\) (opposite side of the bisection) to include a point \(D\text{.}\) \(\angle ABC = 90^\circ\text{,}\) so \(\angle ACB > 90^\circ\text{,}\) which implies \(\angle BCD \lt 90^\circ\) by SMSG15. However, this cannot be the case since Theorem 2.1.11 says the exterior angle \(\angle BCD\) should be greater than \(\angle ABC\) (or \(\angle BAC\)); so, our original assumption was wrong. Thus \(|AB|\) is not greater than \(|AC|\text{.}\) Therefore, \(|AB| \lt |AC|\text{,}\) so the shortest distance to the line is from the point to the foot of the perpendicular.
\(m\angle 3 + m\angle 6 = \pi \) is given. Similarly, \(m\angle 4 + m\angle 5 = \pi \) is given.
\(\angle 3 \) and \(\angle 4 \) are supplementary.
\(\angle 5 \) and \(\angle 6 \) are supplementary.
\(m\angle 4 = m\angle 6 \)
\(m\angle 3 = m\angle 5 \)
\(\angle 4 \) and \(\angle 6 \) are alternate interior angles, and \(\angle 3 \) and \(\angle 5 \) are also alternate interior angles, and by theorem 3.1.2, lines 1 and 2 are parallel.

Subsection 3.1.2 Equivalency

The following theorem produces an easier to use version of Euclid's postulate.
Let \(\boldsymbol T\) be the statement, “The sum of the angles on one side of a transversal of two lines is equal to the sum of two right angles”. Let \(\boldsymbol P\) be the statement, “The lines are parallel.”
In Theorem 3.1.4 we proved \(\boldsymbol T \implies \boldsymbol P\text{.}\) On the other hand, Euclid's postulate states (in relevant part) \(\neg \boldsymbol T \implies \neg \boldsymbol P\text{.}\) Therefore, together they give \(\boldsymbol T \iff \boldsymbol P\text{.}\)
The alternate interior angle converse theorem states “Given parallel lines and a transversal of those lines, the alternate interior angles formed by the transversal are congruent.”
Suppose we're given two parallel lines \(L\) and \(M\) and a transversal intersecting points \(A\) and \(B\text{.}\) Now, construct a perpendicular from \(A\) to a point \(C\text{.}\) Applying Playfair, using the point \(B\text{,}\) construct a line segment \(\overline{BD}\) that is parallel to \(\overline{AC}\text{.}\) Because \(L\) is parallel to \(M\text{,}\) \(\overline{BD}\) also creates a bisection, so \(\angle ACB \cong \angle ADB\text{.}\) Note we have two triangles \(\triangle ABD\) and \(\triangle ABC\text{.}\) Because \(L\) is parallel to \(M\text{,}\) \(\angle DAB \cong \angle ABC\text{.}\) Of course, \(\overline{AB} \cong \overline{AB}\text{,}\) so the two triangles \(\triangle ADB\) and \(\triangle ABC\) are congruent. Therefore, by CPCTC, \(\overline{BD} \cong \overline{AC}\text{,}\) so the distance from \(L\) to \(M\) is always the same.
By contraposition, Euclid's postulate is equivalent to: “If lines \(l\) and \(m\) are parallel, then the angles on one side of a transversal of \(l\) and \(m\) sum to two right angles.” We therefore show that the equidistance of parallel lines implies that the angles on one side of a transversal of parallels sum to two right angles.
Let \(l\) and \(m\) be parallel lines. By the Equidistance Postulate, if \(X\) is any point on \(l\text{,}\) then \(\mathrm{d(X,m)} = k\) is a constant corresponding to the length of a line segment drawn from \(X\) to the foot of the perpendicular on \(m\text{.}\) Let \(t\) be a transversal of \(l\) and \(m\text{.}\) These line segments form right angles with both \(l\) and \(m\text{.}\)
Let \(t\) intersect \(l\) and \(m\) at \(A\) and \(C\) respectively. Let \(D\) and \(B\) be the points on \(l\) and \(m\) such that \(\overline{AB}\) and \(\overline{CD}\) have length \(k\text{.}\) Then the triangles \(\triangle ABC\) and \(\triangle CDA\) are congruent right triangles by Angle-Angle-Side.
Since \(\angle ACB\) and \(\angle DAC\) are congruent, their supplementary angles are also congruent. Thus \(\angle XAC \cong \angle YCA\text{.}\) But in that case \(\angle XAC\) is supplementary to \(\angle ACB\text{,}\) and so
\begin{equation*} m\angle ACB + m\angle XAC = \pi \end{equation*}
as claimed.
Therefore, if lines \(l\) and \(m\) are parallel, then angles on one side of a transversal of \(l\) and \(m\) sum to two right angles.
Let \(\boldsymbol{PF}\) be Playfair's postulate, \(\boldsymbol{QD}\) be the equidistance postulate, and \(\boldsymbol{EU}\) be Euclid's postulate. Then Theorem 3.1.6 gives \(\boldsymbol{EU} \implies \boldsymbol{PF}\text{.}\) Theorem 3.1.7 and Theorem 3.1.8 give \(\boldsymbol{PF} \implies \boldsymbol{QD}\text{.}\) Finally, Theorem 3.1.9 is \(\boldsymbol{QD}\implies\boldsymbol{EU}\text{.}\) All together then,
\begin{equation*} \boldsymbol{EU}\implies\boldsymbol{PF}\implies\boldsymbol{QD}\implies\boldsymbol{EU}. \end{equation*}
Therefore, the three postulates are equivalent.